Editorial search optimization

PRODUCT DESIGN

QUALITATIVE USER RESEARCH

A/B TESTING

I designed the feature that reduced the amount of visually repetitive images and helped users find their desired images faster, through providing low and high-fidelity prototypes, strategizing qualitative user research and synthesis, and delivering data-backed design improvements for A/B testing.

TIMELINE

3 weeks design

2 weeks user research

TOOL

Figma
Userlytics

ROLE

Product design

Research strategy & synthesis

PROJECT BACKGROUND

A large potion of Editorial users come to Getty Images to find the most recent images related to a personality or event. While Getty provide a broad range of visuals, users sometimes have to browse through multiple pages of visually similar images before finding the ones they need. This feature is developed as a part of a long term goal to optimize Getty's Editorial search experience.

GOAL

Design a user flow that enables users to group visually similar images together in the search results page, helping users to browse through a wider variety of visuals and find their desired images faster.

Design directions

I proposed several design directions for alignment with stakeholders and cross functional partners, two of which are shown below.

DIRECTION 1

Users can group similar images by using a toggle inside the filter panel, and view the grouped images inside a popup modal.

DIRECTION 2

Users can group similar images using a link above the search results, preview grouped images on hover, and view all grouped images in the asset detail page.

User research

During the design process, the team was concerned that hiding images from the search results can risk introducing a fear of missing out and break users' trust. To gain a clearer understanding of the desirability and user behavior around the proposed feature, I worked with the team's user researcher to strategize a study to address those concerns.

RESEARCH GOALS

  1. Understand whether showing more variety in serach results will help users find images easily.

  2. Understand if the location for viewing visually similar content match user expectations.

RESEARCH METHOD

  • Qualitative user research

  • Unmoderated testing with prototypes

  • 17 participants

RESEARCH LEARNINGS

DESIRABILITY

Seeing a wider variety of images is beneficial for users who aren’t looking for highly specific visuals.

Being able to compare similar images helps users select the best image for their projects.

LOCATION

Majority of customers had difficulties finding the “More Related Images” section

Customers like the experience of seeing visually similar content in the carousel once they found it.

KEY FEATURES

Group related images

Clear visual indication is essential to signal for additional content.

Users want to control when they see more image variety.

Design proposals following research learnings

After synthesizing the research data, I used the findings to inform the design of MVP that reduces the engineering effort needed to provide us with initial A/B testing results. I also proposed additional enhancements that better addresses the frictions discovered in the qualitative research.

MINIMUM VIABLE PRODUCT FOR A/B TESTING

ADDITIONAL DESIGN PROPOSALS

Animated tooltip.

Gallery showing similar images with enhanced visibility.

Visual modal to help clarify the feature to users.

IMPACT

The initial test results showed positive results: download rate increased by 5%, first interaction depth decreased by 17%, maximum interaction depth decreased by 11%, and maximum download depth decreased by 16%.

NEXT STEPS

After proving the value of this feature through both qualitative and initial quantitative testing, the team is now working on improving the algorithm before developing the next design iteration.